Listen up, everyone. I've got a really great idea. You're gonna love it!!1!
You know who we should have on the cover of Vogue? SIENNA MILLER.
UK Vogue, October 2009
Because it's been, oooooh, AGES since she last had a Vogue cover.
US Vogue, July 2009. AKA TEN MINUTES AGO.
And it's not as if she's been featured before...
Last time I looked, Sienna Miller wasn't the only blonde, skinny, actress/model/designer/whatever on the planet. So why does Vogue insist on treating her as though she is? Did anyone even watch G.I. Joe?
What's the endless fascination with her? No, seriously, WHAT IS ITTTTT. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND.
she was also on the cover of last months GQ and seems to feature as a 'guest stylist' in glamour every other month (both of which are also published by conde nast.) maybe her agency are affiliated with them in some way?
Posted by: R | 12 September 2009 at 14:15
No-one saw G.I. Joe
'cause it's shit...
Apart from Jude Law tho
Posted by: the boy | 12 September 2009 at 18:09
i feel the same about the endless kate moss covers tbh, how many times has she been on the cover? every time i see an issue with her on the front i think NOT AGAIN followed by ZZZZZZZZZZZ BORING/HAGGARD followed by NOT BUYING THAT THEN.
Posted by: kim | 13 September 2009 at 21:16
I think its directly linked to the film - US September 2007. A link is created in people's minds and they're more likely to pick the latest one up after so much Sienna coverage in the movie. Haha, look at that lank hair!
Posted by: Amber | 14 September 2009 at 11:28
Went to see 'The September Issue' last night....ohh dear Sienna, she didnt come across too well and wasn't looking so hot either. Mario Testino also had a starring role and looked a little silly.....
D&L x
www.dukeandlarn.com
Posted by: D&L | 17 September 2009 at 15:50